|
Comments
|
|
would have been nice to see some thesaurus data in the example
|
|
|
very good, nice to have understood the cost as well of the differences
|
|
|
Not entirely related to the video, but adding the Top_N_By_Rank parameter to the contains table to further restrict results would have been nice to see. Also, any explanation around the Top_N_By_Rank parameter behavior when used.
|
|
|
Good information. He spoke slow enough that the concept could be easily understood.
|
|
|
This is an excellent tip!!! It will certainly come in handy with our systems.
|
|
|
would have been good to show each query on its own, rather than overwriting the same one. makes it easier to compare the syntax.
|
|
|
good, clear, consice speaker - but shoulda used a word other than "ride" that DOES have results from thesaurus - since that's what he was freakin' trying to show.
|
|
|
That's perfect! I'm starting to work on a page that requires some pretty intense string searches and knowing this will help a lot. Great video!
|
|
|
very well presented and very USEFUL!!
|
|
|
Great tips and video.
Thanks for sharing.
|
|
Charlie Bruno on
7/27/2010
Very well explained by the author.
|
|
|
Nothing
|
|
|
I had no idea this power existed in SQL server. Thanks!!
|
|
|
Excellent pace and presentation content. Just right!
|
|
|
Nice job on a murky, under-documented subject.
Hope there are more to follow.
Thanks!
|
|
|
I normally Unioned together queries to find the different contains, this saves a lot of work. Thanks!
|
|
|
It was hard to follow, there were some words used that needed further explanation.
|
|
|
marvelous! I appreciate a great new stuff, thanks...Tahir
|
|
|
You should have used a word that was in the Thersaus, but the topic was good to know more about.
|
|
|
Need Full Text Specificiation Spec
|
|
|
A bit confusing final aim
|
|
|
an excellent tip
|